Innovación, esquema y sostenibilidad general: nuevas tendencias para el impulso local en la modernidad.

Alexis J. Macías-Loor, Alexis J. Macías-Mendoza

Resumen


Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes las capacidades de construcción de productos intangibles. La acción política del design es cada vez más urgente; los designers están llamados a cumplir un papel protagónico en la construcción crítica de la nueva ciudadanía. Un nuevo campo de acción, el design social.


Palabras clave


esquema; esquema participativo; innovación social; sostenibilidad.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Alexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600

Barbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Kõnigswinter: H. F. Ullmann.

Bologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons. Recuperado de http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf

Bonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Campbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of "craft" as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.002

Chen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2622

Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075

El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267

Abd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism "a pop-up local change for cairo's built environment". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032

Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366

Fuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.

Guimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudo-semdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369

Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.2154

Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04

Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44.

Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities 'work'. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2),100-111 https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05

Ibarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlng

Kelkar, N. P y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01

Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1.

Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001

Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06

Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

Marttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03

Matei, C. S. (2014). Globalization - An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs-pro.2014.08.207

Mcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili.

McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdf

Monteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008) Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580392647-01

Moura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings,2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/despro-ped2016-0246

Mulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf

Napawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02

Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108

Pacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=en

Patarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.

Phills J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University.

Papanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design -Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007).

Pinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta.

Pollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.068

Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065

Sadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.119.

Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.382

Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.227

Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07

Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024

Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1077

Unesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO.pdf

Yair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394.

van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. 2.https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06

Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia's neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008

Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares.

WWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasileira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ecologicaglobal/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v2i2.751

Enlaces de Referencia

  • Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia
';

Bookmark and Share




Polo del Conocimiento              

Revista Científico-Académica Multidisciplinaria

ISSN: 2550-682X

Casa Editora del Polo                                                 

Manta - Ecuador       

Dirección: Ciudadela El Palmar, II Etapa,  Manta - Manabí - Ecuador.

Código Postal: 130801

Teléfonos: 056051775/0991871420

Email: polodelconocimientorevista@gmail.com / director@polodelconocimiento.com

URL: https://www.polodelconocimiento.com/